
Fujifilm Crystal Archive 8x10 Lustre Photo Paper
Achieve Exceptional Color and Stability with this Enlarging PaperFujifilm 8x10" Fujicolor Crystal Archive Type II Lustre Enlarging Paper delivers superb colors, pure whites, and exceptional image stability. Ideal for professional photographers and enthusiasts, this paper ensures your prints have ...
*Price sourced from Amazon.com. Last updated:Jun 28, 2026.Price and availability are subject to change.
Notice a mistake? Let Us Know
Overview
Achieve Exceptional Color and Stability with this Enlarging Paper
Fujifilm 8x10" Fujicolor Crystal Archive Type II Lustre Enlarging Paper delivers superb colors, pure whites, and exceptional image stability. Ideal for professional photographers and enthusiasts, this paper ensures your prints have long-lasting beauty and sharpness.
Specifications:
- Brand: Fujifilm
- Type: Fujicolor Crystal Archive Type II
- Size: 8x10 inches
- Surface: Lustre
- Quantity: 100 Sheets
- Features: Outstanding Color Reproduction, Improves Long-Term Dye Stability, Increases Print Longevity
Key Features
Offers outstanding color reproduction
Improves long-term dye stability
Increases print longevity
Specifications
Pros & Cons
👍 Pros
- Offers outstanding color reproduction, ensuring vibrant and true-to-life prints.
- Improves long-term dye stability, contributing to the archival quality of photographs.
- Increases print longevity, helping preserved memories last for an extended period.
- Provides a lustre finish, which can reduce glare while maintaining rich detail.
- Specifically sized at 8x10, a common and versatile format for photo printing and framing.
👎 Cons
- As lustre paper, it does not offer the high-gloss reflective finish some users might prefer.
- The 8x10 size may not be ideal for all printing needs, such as larger prints or custom dimensions.
- Does not specify the paper weight or thickness, which could be a factor for specific applications.
- Compatibility with different printer types (e.g., inkjet vs. dye-sub) is not mentioned.
- Pricing information is not provided, making cost-effectiveness relative to other papers unclear.