
Western Digital 0B31241 HGST Ultrastar 1.8TB 10K RPM SAS HDD
Enterprise-Class Performance with HGST Ultrastar C10K1800 The HGST Ultrastar C10K1800 delivers best-in-class performance and capacity for enterprise environments. This 10K RPM hard drive, with up to 1.8TB of storage, features a 12Gb/s SAS interface and advanced format options, ensuring superior p...
Check availabilityNotice a mistake? Let Us Know
Overview
Enterprise-Class Performance with HGST Ultrastar C10K1800
The HGST Ultrastar C10K1800 delivers best-in-class performance and capacity for enterprise environments. This 10K RPM hard drive, with up to 1.8TB of storage, features a 12Gb/s SAS interface and advanced format options, ensuring superior performance and reliability for demanding 24x7 workloads.
Specifications:
- Capacity: 1800GB
- RPM: 10000RPM
- Interface: SAS
- Form Factor: 2.5-Inch
- Cache: 128 MB
Key Features
10K RPM
SAS 12Gb/s
Media cache architecture
Rotational Vibration Safeuard (RVS)
Workload detector technology
Specifications
Pros & Cons
👍 Pros
- Operates at 10K RPM, ensuring faster data access and transfer speeds compared to traditional 7.2K RPM drives.
- Utilizes a SAS 12Gb/s interface, providing high bandwidth connectivity for demanding enterprise workloads.
- Incorporates Media cache architecture, which can help improve read/write performance for various applications.
- Features Rotational Vibration Safeguard (RVS), designed to enhance drive reliability and performance in multi-drive environments.
- Equipped with Workload detector technology, which optimizes drive operations based on the specific application's demands.
👎 Cons
- The 1.8TB capacity may be a limitation for enterprise environments requiring significantly larger single-drive storage solutions.
- As a Hard Disk Drive (HDD), its performance will be inherently slower compared to Solid State Drives (SSDs) for random read/write operations.
- SAS drives typically require a SAS controller, which may not be present in all systems, adding to potential setup costs.
- The 10K RPM operation could lead to higher power consumption and noise levels compared to lower RPM or SSD alternatives.
- Specific details on buffer size or sustained transfer rates are not provided, which could be relevant for performance assessment.